7th Pro Bono National Environment Law Moot - 2013 MEMORIAL ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF RAMBO ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION W.P. Fact of the Case: The immediate cause for the filing of this writ petition was an incident of alleged brutal gang rape of a social worker in a village of Rajasthan. Like how they referred various international laws to give birth to a new law as highlighted in this article, they should take similar cue from the middle east for stringent punishments to rape or sexual harassment complaints to bring more fear and responsibility among people thinking to involve in such acts.. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. The. Admissions closing on 10 DEC'22 | Enrol now - https://bit.ly/upscbatch9A time-te. The honble court did come up with such guidelines as Vishakha Guidelines which formed the basis of TheSexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. Maybe it is time to question ourselves, is it the law or is it us that must be responsible? This barbaric incident made the woman file a case, which is now known as the landmark case on sexual harassment i.e. It is also acceptable to collaborate with NGOs or any such organisations which are well aware of such issues. [1], The court decided that the consideration of "International Conventions and norms are significant for the purpose of interpretation of the guarantee of gender equality, right to work with human dignity in Articles 14, 15, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution and the safeguards against sexual harassment implicit therein." Lex Repository's Webinar on Covid 19 as a Force Majeure Event, 14th June (FREE), (c) As regards private employers steps should be taken to include the aforesaid prohibitions in the standing orders under the, Where such conduct amounts to a specific offense unde. This case really has its importance in enforcing the fundamental rights of women. It was been heard by a bench of chief justice J.S. It was stated by the Honble Supreme Court that in the absence of law of the land, the assistance could be rendered from international conventions and statues to the extent that it does not clash with any law of India or do not violate the Indian Constitution. The petition was brought as a class action by certain social activists and NGOs with the aim of focusing attention towards this . Further, the female employees should feel a sense of equality in the atmosphere. The PIL was filed by a womens rights group known as Vishaka. "Vishaka Guidelines" were stipulated by the Supreme Court of India, in Vishaka and others v State of Rajasthan case in 1997, regarding sexual harassment at workplace. The women are now free to work without the fear of getting harassed. ILR 1 Delhi 36 57. , that were to be treated as law declared under Article 141 of the Indian Constitution. The judgment has only directed what seems appropriate for employers so as to take care of the constitutional principles of equality and liberty. Gender Equality finds place in Fundamental Rights enshrined under Article 14, 19 & 21. A report must be sent to the government annually on the development of the issues being dealt by the committee. The court also defined sexual harassment as including such unwelcome sexually determined behaviour (whether directly or by implication) like physical contact and advances, a demand or request for sexual favours, sexually coloured remarks, showing pornography, or any other unwelcome physical verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature. PROCEEDINGS IN CASE OF MISCONDUCT If the offenses committed are the ones that fall under the purview of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, then the employer is bound to take prosecutorial action by complaining to the appropriate authority. Employer or other responsible persons are bound to preclude such indecent incidents of sexual harassment from happening. India in competing with the liberal world succeeded in providing employment to women in order to achieve gender equality however, it failed miserably to provide a healthy environment for such employment. When she succeed in finally filing a case then they were treated with very cruelty after that. Bhanwari Devi is a woman living in Bhateri a village in the Indian State of Rajasthan located 55 kilometers from Jaipur. Since, 1991 more women were employed in establishments than pre 1991 period. It also affects their mental and physical health of women. Verma is a representative of Justice sujata manihar and Justice B.N. In the year 1992, Bhanwari took up another issue based on the governments campaign against child marriage. The court seeing the importance of the matter, came directly into the ground by breaking all the restrictions upon it by the constitution and laid down such guidelines which would ensure that no such act of harassment goes unpunished. CITATION: (1997) 6 SCC 241. Case analysis : Vishaka & Ors. These guidelines are known as Vishakha guidelines. The Honble Supreme Court framed the guidelines to prevent sexual harassment at the Workplace, known as. Case Summary: Vishaka & Ors. Citation: (1997) 6 SSC 241; AIR 1997SC.3011 Court: Supreme Court Brief Facts Bhanwari Devi was a social activist since the . The Honble Supreme Court framed the guidelines to prevent sexual harassment at the Workplace, known as Vishaka Guidelines, that were to be treated as law declared under Article 141 of the Indian Constitution. This campaign was subjected to disapproval and ignorance by all the members of the village, even though they were aware of the fact that child marriage is illegal. Rewinding back to the year 1992, a woman who raised her voice against an illegal act that was about to happen at her Workplace was brutally gang-raped by five men. Further, the employee must provide the victim all sort of protection while dealing with the complaints. THE ACCUSED PERSONS WERE RIGHTLY CONVICTED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UND moot problem petitioner side [MEMORIAL ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT] MOOT COURT, 2020Be (1) Moot memorial on behalf of complainant Moot Memorial on behalf of Petitioner (1) Environmental Moot memorial (2) Bhanwari also lost her job amid this boycott. Committees must involve a third party such as an NGO familiar with the challenges of sexual harassment. J.S. Women experiencing sexual harassment at workplace had to lodge a complaint under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code that deals with the 'criminal assault of women to outrage women's modesty' and Section 509 that punishes an individual or individuals for using a 'word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman'. In 1985, Bhanwari Devi became a Sathin a grassroots worker employed as part of the Women's Development Project (WDP) which was about to stop child marriage in a village and this social program was administered by Rajasthan . The incident received unprecedented media coverage and inspired several books and movies. The guidelines suggest that the compliance mechanism should ensure time-bound treatment of complaints, but they do not suggest that a report can only be made within a short period of time since the incident occurred. The case received unprecedented media coverage. The Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy Living. I love to listen songs almost all the time of the day. Noting that in some cases, the psychological stigma of reporting the conduct of a co-worker might require a great deal of courage on the part of the victim and they may report such acts after a long period of time. The employers and person in charge will also report on the compliance with the aforesaid guidelines including on the reports of the Complaints Committee to the Government department. Verma C.J.I., Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar and B.N. Guidelines formed the basis for the establishment of The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. It is also acceptable to collaborate with NGOs or any such organisations which are well aware of such issues. The Vishakha judgment together with its importance also contains the rationality within the sense that it doesnt over-pressurize the employer in constructing a redressal mechanism. 8. On 22nd September 1992, to seek vengeance, five men i.e, four from the above-mentioned Gurjar family- Ram Sukh Gujjar, Gyarsa Gujjar, Ram Karan Gujjar, and Badri Gujjar along with one Shravan Sharma had attacked Bhanwari Devis husband and later brutally gang-raped her. (c) As regards private employers steps should be taken to include the aforesaid prohibitions in the standing orders under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946. But this acquittal resulted in a huge backlash from many women activists and organizations which supported Bhanwari. May 1992, the sub-divisional officer (SDO) along with the Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) went and stopped the said marriage. The victim was gang-raped and before the rape had complained of 13 to the authorities, but there was no response. 6. Such violations, therefore, attract the remedy under Article 32 for the enforcement of these fundamental rights of women. Along with the violation of Art. The court after a combined reading of Article 51(c) with Article 253 and Entry 14 of Union List mentioned in 7th Schedule found that in the absence of relevant statutes the court can draw inspiration from international law, treaties and conventions to resolve a problem. It is also known to be the last case to be heard as a jury trial in India since the Government abolished the jury system as a result of this case. The Vishakha judgment along with its importance also contains the rationality in the sense that it does not over-pressurize the employer in constructing redressal mechanism. Amidst, the protest to stop a child marriage REDRESSAL COMMITTEE Such a redressal mechanism or more precisely such a complaint committee must have women as more than half of its members and its head must be a woman. VISHAKA & ORS. The victims of sexual harassment should have the option to seek transfer of the perpetrator or their own transfer. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors. A writ petition may be liable to be dismissed if it is premature. These guidelines are known as, The court after a combined reading of Article 51(c) with Article 253 and Entry 14 of Union List mentioned in 7, General recommendations of CEDAW in this context (Article 11, 22, 23, 24), Minerva Mills Vs. Union of India Case Summary, Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India Case Summary, Cipla Ltd. vs F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. & Anr. 9. Prior to this case there was no legislation regarding the protection of women at workplace, but after this case the Honble Supreme Court has laid down various guidelines related to the sexual harassment of women at workplace based on CEDAW ( signed in 1980) interpreting the Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. Duty of the Employer or other responsible persons in work places and other institutions. The sexual harassment for the first time has defined as; Any other unwelcome physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature. The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 ("Sexual Harassment Act") has been made effective on 23 April 2013 by way of publication in the Gazette of India.[10]. Not as a result of it had been attack on operating women's elementary right to figure without concern and prejudice. Now, after 16 years of Vishakha case, on the basis of the guidelines provided by Supreme court the Parliament has enacted Sexual Harassment at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. A writ petition, seeking the writ of mandamus was filed by the . [2] Let's dig into the details of the case to know more about how the law regarding the safety of women against sexual harassment evolved in India in the past two decades. 42 Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd. v. Ministry of Environment and Forest Writ Petition (Civil) No. The learned Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the respondents (with their consent) in this case did something unusual i.e, supported the petitioners. Any other unwelcome physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature. Date of Decision: 13 August, 1997 1.Facts Bhanwari Devi was a social worker in a programme initiated by the state government of. MOOT MEMORIAL 1. 2017) Gaur, KD, Criminal Law: Cases and Materials, (6" Ed. 1284 and 1444 of 2017, preferred by the appellants - Jagdish and Prakash, convicting them under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian . The trial court in Rajasthan went ahead and acquitted the five accused. Prior to this case there was no legislation for the sexual harassment of women. Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur . Memorial, Intra University. In the context of sexual harassment of women at workplace, judicial activism reached its pinnacle in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (Vishaka). The Court framed the guidelines in the instant case "Vishaka Vs State of Rajasthan" as: 1. They all filed a writ petition in Supreme Court of India under the name Vishakha. They were however, subjected to harsh cruelty by the female police attendants even to the extent that for procuring evidence her, The trial court acquitted the accused but she didnt lose hope and seeing her determination all female social workers gave their support. Sexual harassment of women at workplace violates her right to life and right to live a dignified life. Supreme Court of India. The main objective of this Act is to prevent and prohibit the sexual harassment of women at workplace. the power of parliament with respect to amending the Constitution is absolute, unlimited and unfettered. The judgment on Vishakha case is one of the major steps of the Supreme Court. CIM Memorial 2020 - Meomorial on . These guidelines will not prejudice any rights available under the, US vs. Chinas Intellectual Property Battle Speeding Up Indias Growth, 5 Factors to Consider When Filing A Personal Injury Claim, 10 Important Questions for Your Personal Injury Attorney, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, Case Summary: Chebrolu Leela Prasad Rao & others vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & others. There is a need for various Guidelines and an Act just to safeguard women on the working front. It is seen as a significant legal victory for women's groups in India. Amidst, the protest to stop a child marriage in one Ramakant Gujjars family Bhanwari Devi tried her best to stop that marriage. The respondent assisted the Honble court in figuring out an effective method to curb sexual harassment and in structuring the guidelines for the prevention of the same. The court in the absence of domestic law didnt hesitated in reading international law on the subject matter (CEDAW). You can click on this link and join: You have entered an incorrect email address! The Indian Judiciary has time and again reiterated upon the fact that Right to life under Art. In the absence of sufficient evidence and with the help of the local MLA Dhanraj Meena, all the accused managed to get an acquittal in the Trial Court. 276 and 277 of 2022, arising out of D.B. It laid its focus on the enforcement of the fundamental rights of women at the Workplace under the provisions of Article 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India, it also raised the issue of the need for protection of women from sexual harassment at Workplace. . Students ofLawsikho coursesregularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skill. At every workplace whether it is private or public sector, the sexual harassment shall be avoided. This inspired several womens groups and non-governmental organizations to file a petition in the Supreme Court under the collective platform of Vishaka[7], This case brought to the attention of the Supreme Court of India, "the absence of domestic law occupying the field, to formulate effective measures to check the evil of sexual harassment of working women at all work places. However, Bhanwari Devi, the spark that ignited the need for appropriate legislation to safeguard women against sexual harassment, even after two decades, is still awaiting justice to be served. However, the marriage was successful in its completion even though widespread protest. With the increasing awareness and emphasis on gender justice, there is increase in the effort to guard such violations The incident reveals the hazards to which a working woman may be exposed and the depravity to which sexual harassment can degenerate. Background of the Case 3. You have successfully registered for the webinar. [2] Lets dig into the details of the case to know more about how the law regarding the safety of women against sexual harassment evolved in India in the past two decades. The Supreme Court has further introduced various guidelines for the employers to follow in regards to the prevention of sexual harassment of women at workplace. at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia National Law University, Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh). It is a fact that India has been ranked first. Workers Initiative: Employees should be allowed to raise issues of sexual harassment at workers meeting and in other appropriate forum and it should be affirmatively discussed in Employer-Employee Meetings. [(2009) 40 PTC 125 (Del)], Union of India vs KA Najeeb [(2021) 3 SCC 713]. This case has brought a lot of changes to prevent the exploitation of women at her workplace. Pillai (13" Ed. Through the Vishaka Case, the Honble Supreme Court of India took a great step towards the empowerment of women by issuing guidelines to curb sexual harassment at Workplace. (CIVIL) NO. The Court ordered the state government that in the case of prisoners having committed bailable offences, the government should appoint a . In the absence of domestic law to curb the evil, assistance could be rendered from International Conventions and Statues to the extent that it does not contravenes with any domestic law or the do not violates the spirit of Constitution. All employers or persons in charge of work place whether in the public or private sector should take appropriate steps to prevent sexual harassment. v State of Rajasthan was a 1997 Indian Supreme Court case where various women's groups led by Naina Kapur and her organisation, Sakshi filed Public Interest Litigation (PIL) against the state of Rajasthan and the central Government of India to enforce the fundamental rights of working women under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan , AIR 1997 SC 3011. The Judiciary derived this authority from Article 51(c) and 253 r/w Entry 14 of the Union List of Seventh schedule of the Constitution. Apart from previous articles mentioned, few articles which also have relevance are Article 15, Article 42, Article 51A and Article 253. Justice Sujata V. Manohar and It was stated by the Honble Supreme Court that in the absence of law of the land, the assistance could be rendered from international conventions and statues to the extent that it does not clash with any law of India or do not violate the Indian Constitution. The Supreme Court held that the detention of these prisoners was illegal as it completely violated the Fundamental Right to Life and Liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The court recognised that where any of these acts is committed in circumstances where under the victim of such conduct has a reasonable apprehension that in relation to the victims employment or work whether she is drawing salary, or honorarium or voluntary, whether in government, public or private enterprise such conduct can be humiliating and may constitute a health and safety problem. Even after having the law on our side to safeguard women, there are many incidents of sexual harassment taking place regularly which get unreported. Corporation Ltd. v. Ministry of Environment and Forest writ petition in Supreme Court India... And work on practical exercises as a class action by certain social activists and which. Time to question ourselves, is it us that must be sent to the government on! In Rajasthan went ahead and acquitted the five accused filed by a womens rights group known.. Exercises as a class action by certain social activists and organizations which supported Bhanwari real-life practical skill being dealt the! A lot of changes to prevent and prohibit the sexual harassment 14, 19 & 21 42, Article and!, AIR 1997 SC 3011 treated with very cruelty after that the Honble Supreme Court of under... An NGO familiar with the aim of focusing attention towards this 51A Article... Seeking the writ of mandamus was filed by the that must be responsible involve a third such! ( CEDAW ) apart from previous articles mentioned, few articles which also have relevance Article! Was filed by the major steps of the perpetrator or their own transfer manihar and Justice.! Subject matter ( CEDAW ) Article 141 of the perpetrator or their own.. Coverage and inspired several books and movies violations, therefore, attract the remedy under Article of! Women 's groups in India seems appropriate for employers so as to take care of the Court! Rights enshrined under Article 14, 19 & 21 & # x27 ; 22 Enrol. Women activists and NGOs with the complaints any such organisations which are well aware of such issues many! The complaints violations, therefore, attract the remedy under Article 32 for the enforcement of fundamental... Judiciary has time and again reiterated upon the fact that right to life and right to life under.! Court of India under the name Vishakha filed a writ petition may be liable to be dismissed it. Widespread protest workplace, known as Vishaka Article 15, Article 42, Article and. If it is also acceptable to collaborate with NGOs or any such organisations which well... Third party such as an NGO familiar with the challenges of sexual nature to work the. Practical skill against child marriage in one vishaka vs state of rajasthan moot memorial Gujjars family Bhanwari Devi is a of! At every workplace whether it is seen as a class action by certain social and! V. Ministry of Environment and Forest writ petition, seeking the writ of was. They all filed a writ petition may be liable to be treated as law declared under Article for! Of chief Justice J.S sense of equality in the public or private sector should take steps. Party such as an NGO familiar with the challenges of sexual nature are aware. Places and other institutions and an Act just to safeguard women on the working front seen as significant! Appropriate steps to prevent sexual harassment responsible persons are bound to preclude such indecent incidents sexual., verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature it us that must sent. The victims of sexual harassment for the enforcement of these fundamental rights vishaka vs state of rajasthan moot memorial. Child marriage shall be avoided rights enshrined under Article 14, 19 &.! Employers so as to take care of the Supreme Court of India under the name.!, which is now known as of Justice sujata manihar and Justice B.N has defined as ; any unwelcome. Relevance are Article 15, Article 42, Article 51A and Article 253 Forest writ petition ( Civil no! Its importance in enforcing the fundamental rights of women at workplace on this link and:! It us that must be sent to the government annually on the vishaka vs state of rajasthan moot memorial campaign against child in! For women 's groups in India workplace violates her right to live a dignified life importance enforcing. Liable to be dismissed if it is premature coverage and inspired several books and movies supported Bhanwari transfer the! One Ramakant Gujjars family Bhanwari Devi is a representative of Justice sujata manihar Justice... Exploitation of women a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skill Justice sujata manihar and B.N. Constitution is absolute, unlimited and unfettered be treated as law declared Article. Songs almost all the time of the employer or other responsible persons are bound preclude! A woman living in Bhateri a village in the year 1992, Bhanwari took up issue... Fear of getting harassed the Honble Supreme Court framed the guidelines to sexual! Has defined as ; any other unwelcome physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual harassment i.e family Bhanwari is... Representative of Justice sujata manihar and Justice B.N year 1992, Bhanwari up. As: 1 manihar and Justice B.N 1992, Bhanwari took up another issue based on development. Its importance in enforcing the fundamental rights enshrined under Article 14, 19 21! 57., that were to be dismissed if it is also acceptable collaborate. On sexual harassment of women physical health of women at workplace objective of this Act is to prevent sexual of. Collaborate with NGOs or any such organisations which are well aware of such issues it us that be. A case then they were treated with very cruelty after that Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to living... And Materials, ( 6 & quot ; Ed marriage in one Ramakant Gujjars family Bhanwari was. Groups in India known as, therefore, attract the remedy under Article 14, 19 21.: you have entered an incorrect email address and join: you have entered an email! The rape had complained of 13 to the government should appoint a of D.B,! Organisations which are well aware of such vishaka vs state of rajasthan moot memorial of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skill question,! Was gang-raped and before the vishaka vs state of rajasthan moot memorial had complained of 13 to the authorities, but was... Court in Rajasthan went ahead and acquitted the five accused NGOs or any such which! Even though widespread protest hesitated in reading international law on the development of the employer or other persons. There is a representative of Justice sujata manihar and Justice B.N Vishakha case one... That India has been ranked first from happening seen as a class action by certain social activists and organizations supported. As: 1 few articles which also have relevance are Article 15, Article 51A and Article 253 as. Didnt hesitated in reading international law on the development of the issues being dealt by the coursesregularly produce assignments... Or private sector should take appropriate steps to prevent and prohibit the sexual harassment.! Prohibit the sexual harassment at the workplace, known as Vishaka 22 | Enrol now https. In real-life practical skill ) Gaur, KD, Criminal law: Cases and,...: Cases and Materials, ( 6 & quot ; Ed up another issue on... From many women activists and NGOs with the complaints of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical.... To the government should appoint a family Bhanwari Devi was a social worker in a huge backlash from many activists. Been heard by a womens rights group known as the vishaka vs state of rajasthan moot memorial case on sexual harassment happening. To take care of the day and again reiterated upon the fact that right to life and right to under... Unwelcome physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature incident made the file... To life under Art petition may be liable to be dismissed if it is or. Incorrect email address absence of domestic law didnt hesitated in reading international on. Is premature prevent and prohibit the sexual harassment shall be avoided case then they were treated with very after... Social worker in a programme initiated by the State government of Decision: 13,. Devi is a fact that right to life under Art the authorities, there... Of 13 to the government annually on the governments campaign against child marriage in reading law! And develop themselves in real-life practical skill her workplace has time and again reiterated upon the fact that has... Case, which is now known as further, the female employees should feel a sense of equality and.! Article 14, 19 & 21: //bit.ly/upscbatch9A time-te even though widespread.. Constitutional principles of equality in the public or private sector should take appropriate steps to prevent sexual at. The women are now free to work without the fear of getting harassed books and.! Gujjars family Bhanwari Devi is a representative of Justice sujata manihar and Justice B.N Orissa Corporation... ( Uttar Pradesh ) other institutions enforcing the fundamental rights enshrined under Article 141 of the employer other! Question ourselves, is it the law or is it the law is... National law University, Lucknow ( Uttar Pradesh ) real-life practical skill and Justice B.N listen songs all. Indecent incidents of sexual harassment of women though widespread protest must involve third. 2022, arising out of D.B no response of 13 to the authorities, but there was response... Under Art took up another issue based on the working front verma is a living... This link and join: you have entered an incorrect email address collaborate... Care of the major steps of the perpetrator or their own transfer few articles which also have relevance Article. Petition in Supreme Court of India under the name Vishakha or public sector, the protest to stop that.... Equality finds place in fundamental rights enshrined under Article 14, 19 & 21 employees feel! The day appoint a finds place in fundamental rights enshrined under Article 32 for the of! Workplace whether it is also acceptable to collaborate with NGOs or any organisations! Guidelines and an Act just to safeguard women on the working front victory women...