1589, 1617-21 (2009), available at http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1409&context=dlj. 11. The identifying feature of merit selection is its two-stage appointment process: An appointed commission winnows a list of candidates and then forwards that list of candidates to the governor for appointment. However, any judicial appointment system is rife with cons as well. The appointed judge will subsequently stand for election with no party affiliation, and will be retained if a certain percentage of the vote is received. As a result, nonpartisan elections become somewhat of a character study, with voters being encouraged to take the time to learn more about the individuals presented on the ballot as opposed to simply their party affiliation. 5. Q. Let us know your assignment type and we'll make sure to get you exactly the kind of answer you need. I agree. Liberals, on the other hand, favor judges like Justice Ginsburg or Sotomayor, who are willing to expand the language of the Constitution to "create" civil rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution but which are clearly "meant" to be there. 895, 912-13 (1998); Jim Walker, The Politics of State Courts, in The Judicial Branch of State Government: People, Process, and Politics 171, 178 (Sean OHogan ed., 2006). The summary that follows is not comprehensive in discussing the various methods or positives or negatives for each method. The question of judicial selection has grown even more opaque in the nearly two centuries since, as various other methods for judicial selection have been implemented. Advocates for the life tenure system believe it encourages judicial independence and decreases the likelihood of partisan influences. In concurrence, judges should not be part of the political system, for then they are beholden to someone and may not be impartial as they should. See Kathleen L. Barber, Ohio Judicial ElectionsNonpartisan Premises with Partisan Results, 32 Ohio St. L.J. Chicago Tribune. Goelzhausers work sheds new light on judicial merit selection processes and raises important questions for future researchers. 5. What are five reasons to support the death penalty? Depending on where you live, you might even be electing judges this year. FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation. Your membership has expired - last chance for uninterrupted access to free CLE and other benefits. "What are the pros and cons of the merit appointment system of selecting judges?" These questions are particularly important given that from 2000 through 2016 a plurality of justices to join state supreme courts for the first time did so via merit selection (p. 9). In light of these findings, Goelzhauser recommends that those invested in merit selection turn their attention to attendant issues such as candidate pool construction and commission decision-making (p. 127). Judicial Selection in the States, Natl Ctr. Finally, he examines how the institutional design of merit selection affects committee capture, which could negatively affect merit selection performance. Presumably, these results would vary depending on which party is dominant in state politics. A pros of this process is that it minimizes the chance of selecting a judge because of their political status or their social links. Pros and Cons of Various Judicial Selection Methods . The concern is that members of nominating commissions may represent special interests and may not be drawn from all segments of society. Goelzhauser notes, All the speakers were attorneys or judges who knew the applicants in a professional capacity, and comments were uniformly positive (p. 27). The chief con with appointing judges is that, paradoxically, it may be just as political as letting regular voters select their judges. Adam Liptak & Janet Roberts, Campaign Cash Mirrors a High Courts Rulings, N.Y. Times, Oct. 1, 2006, http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/01/us/01judges.html?pagewanted=all. 763, 763 (1971). The above two posts make it completely clear that it would be very dangerous to elect judges as politicians are elected. A criticism unique to merit selection is that its claim of eliminating party politics from selecting judicial candidates is false. Your membership has expired - last chance for uninterrupted access to free CLE and other benefits. Pros And Cons Of The Texas Judicial System. While still elected directly by their constituents, nonpartisan contested elections see judicial candidates run for office strictly as individuals rather than members of or representatives of political parties. 7. . Elections make judges more democratically accountable David Dewold. History has recorded cases in which certain judges of the Supreme Court have, in their single presence or in their single absence, made the difference in a ruling. Nonpartisan elections were adopted in an attempt to help restore the integrity of the courts while helping break party strangleholds, with Cook County, Illinois, becoming the first to implement the method in 1873.16 As of today, 13 states still rely on contested nonpartisan elections (Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin) to elect their supreme court justices.17. Voters are predominantly laypeople who live without an extensive knowledge of the law and what it means to be a good judge. She was known for her balanced and dispassionate opinions. According to Goelzhauser, merit selection supporters argue that the use of commissioners with requisite legal experience reduces the influence of partisan and patronage considerations, which presumably leads to higher-quality judicial appointees and greater access to judicial office for traditionally underrepresented groups. 12. 10. The two most common methods of selecting state judges (as opposed to federal judges) are election and merit selection. To explore this premise systematically, Goelzhauser submitted public record requests to all states employing merit selection; only Nebraska supplied the information needed to properly explore the factors that influence commission and governor choice. The second set of proposals has focused on judicial selection reform, typically urging states to replace contested elections with a merit selection system. eNotes Editorial, 11 Jan. 2018, https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-pros-cons-merit-appointment-system-selec-396472. Questions regarding judicial philosophy, accountability, and favored or disfavored appellate decisions are a few of the queries posed to applicants. Goelzhauser offers useful and practical suggestions for ways in which states can facilitate increased transparency, such as anonymizing applicant data. Democrats described the move as a power grab. The impact of this change is yet to be seen; however, Goelzhausers discussion in Judicial Merit Selection: Institutional Design and Performance for State Courts provides a much-needed theoretical and empirical lens through which to examine the motivations and potential consequences of such institutional adjustments. Between 2000 and 2009, 20 of the 22 states that use contested elections to choose their supreme courts set spending records. 20. Additionally, due to the costs involved, elections discourage many well-qualified attorneys from seeking judicial office, and the merit selection process generally results in a higher number of appointments of minority and female candidates. Unlike a traditional nonpartisan election, the partisan primary allows for a more curated list of judicial candidates. In many states today, judicial selection is not working. Do some institutional specifications make certain merit selection systems more susceptible to capture, which could affect the systems ability to deliver on things like the appointment of high-quality jurists? Only three statesMassachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Islandhave life tenure (with or without a mandatory retirement age) for judges. Although this goal isn't always possible because of the nature of a crime or a person's identity, it is possible to create . 16. Party voters who participate in their respective primaries can seek to use party affiliation to ensure that the candidates who best typify their values can move forward to the general election. class="algoSlug_icon" data-priority="2">Web. Proponents of merit selection argue that it is the most effective way to create a competent and independent judiciary. With executive and legislative races (both federally and in the states) tending to consume the lions share of the attention during election years, few voters can invest the time, energy, or resources to fully familiarize themselves with the entire roster of judicial candidates up for election.20 Critics also point to the fact that the realities of campaigning make it nearly impossible to prevent partisan politics (and politics more broadly) from playing a role in judicial elections. The initial term of office is one years. However, I do not think that the voters are the ones who should decide how to interpret the laws. The nonpartisan election of judges is a selection method where judges are chosen through elections where they are listed on the ballot without an indication of their political affiliation. for State Cts., http://www.judicialselection.us/judicial_selection/index.cfm?state=OH. First adopted by Mississippi in 1832, contested partisan elections for selecting judges became so widespread that the concept was included in the constitution of every state admitted into the Union between the years 1846 and 1912.11 While the popularity of contested partisan judicial elections has waned in the past century, 20 states still use contested partisan elections to select at least some of their trial court judges and seven (Alabama, Illinois, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Texas) select their appellate judges and supreme court justices through contested partisan elections as well.12. Those who support electing judges indicate that the benefits include allowing voters the opportunity to provide accountability through self-government by the voters, awareness of the political preferences of judges to the voters, and more public control of a judicial system that is dealing with aggressive lawsuits, such as the recent tobacco and ongoing gun cases. 14. Their knowledge of the law and how it can be applied to particular circumstances would allow them to resolve disputes in ways that are objectively correct. & Process 11 (2012). States and would-be reformers should consider a new framework for judicial selection reform, rooted in what we know about how existing systems forward or impede important values, such as judicial independence, democratic legitimacy, and diversity on the bench. Pros Cons Judges who are appointed are more likely to be highly qualified . Some type of merit plan for selection of judges is utilized by 24 states and the District of Columbia. There are also normative questions about how to balance these values when they come into tension. sex offenders,8 and have touted their own record in upholding nearly 90% of all death sentences. 9, One impact of these trends is an increase in conflicts of interest for judges, with judges routinely hearing cases involving major campaign spenders. L. Rev. What that best way is, of course, subject to that debate. To carry out their duties as a judge it is vital that they are impartial, and the party political system and method of voting would guarantee that they would lack that necessary impartiality that is needed. Doing so, proponents claim, ultimately allows for the most qualified candidates to join the judiciary. Surprisingly, relatively little attention has been paid to reselection as such, and how these unique pressures might be mitigated, regardless of how a judge initially made it onto the bench. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Duke University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Duke Privacy Statement. . This is no easy task. Then, using multi-method research approaches involving meticulous case study analyses and impressive original datasets, Goelzhauser provides an insightful and thought-provoking exploration of the stages and implementation of judicial merit selection. Finally, another con of a merit-based system of appointing judges is that deciding, once and for all, what it means to be a "good" judge is inherently impirical. Moving past existing debates opens up the possibility of new selection models better suited to addressing the challenges facing state courts today. Latest answer posted December 11, 2020 at 11:00:01 AM. In particular, empirical evidence suggests that reselection pressures pose unique and serious threats to the fairness of courts. The Governor must select from the list. And contested partisan elections may impact judicial decisions by the incumbent as the day of election approaches. What are the advantages and disadvantages of liberalism and radicalism? Now with nonpartisan elections, there aren't any real costs but with . . 16. Yet merit selection as it is commonly structured raises its own problems, from the use of retention elections, which are increasingly costly and politicized, to inadequate processes for recruiting diverse judicial candidates. Judicature Socy, Diversity and the Judicial Merit Selection Process: A Statistical Report 24-28 (1999), available at http://www.judicialselection.us/uploads/documents/Diversity_and_the_Judicial_Merit_Se_9C4863118945B.pdf. What are the pros and cons of being a probation officer. These trends put new pressures on state court judges, with the potential to impact the everyday lives of people across the country. Tracey E. George & Albert H. Yoon, The Gavel Gap: Who Sits in Judgment on State Courts? 21. After 245 years, the United States has not adopted a single unified method with which to select judges. This article updates a series of articles, including pro/con arguments on merit selection of judges, that were previously published in North Carolina Insight and now are contained in the latest edition of North Carolina Focus: Jack Betts, "The Debate Over Merit Selection of Judges," North Carolina Focus, N. C. Center for . Duke Law School. Ever since, Ohios judicial elections have consisted of the partisan primary and nonpartisan general.22. As far as I am concerned, there are a lot of pros and really no cons that I think are valid concerns. H. Rep. 111-427, 111th Cong., 2d Sess. Educators go through a rigorous application process, and every answer they submit is reviewed by our in-house editorial team. By Andrew J. Clark. Republicans argued that the move was necessary to increase the publics representation on the commission through gubernatorial selection. See Richard Watson & Rondal Downing, The Politics of the Bench and the Bar: Judicial Selection Under the Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan (John Wiley & Sons., Inc. 1969). 4. The idea was first adopted by Missouri during the 1940's The decision to run for office entails substantial cost that may dissuade potential candidates. Sandra Day grew up on a large family ranch near Duncan, Arizona. See Brennan Ctr. Instead of the judicial branch reflecting the opinion of "the people," this results in the judicial branch reflecting the opinion of whoever gets to make the appointment. 8. One component of Goelzhausers analysis of whether merit selection works involves examination across three key metrics: judicial quality, judge diversity, and the influence of partisanship. A nominating committee comprised of both lawyers and nonlawyers presents the governor with a list of nominees, from which the governor selects an appointee. Some critics argue elections create political biases which weaken judicial impartiality. They can't. And the result is that some inexperienced and unqualified people make decisions that affect our lives. Web Site Copyright 1995-2023 WGBH Educational Foundation. This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. 2. Based on your case, ordinary people can be much easier to persuade than judges, who are obviously trained to . However, Goelzhausers discussion illustrates that some states allow for modest inclusion of public views on potential nominees. Bolch Judicial Institute A merit-based appointment system prevents voters from making this mistake. While major political parties have been shut out of the merit selection system, the public is still allowed and encouraged to participate, voicing their opinions on judges when they are up for retention elections. There are of course valid reasons for withholding certain types of information related to judicial applications, given privacy concerns. Judith Resnik, Judicial Selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. A nominating committee comprised of both lawyers and nonlawyers presents the. Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds recently signed legislation that would increase her appointment power over the states judicial merit selection commission by removing the senior supreme court justice from the 17-member commission and giving the governor the authority to fill the particular seat. The Supreme Court should not be subjected to the rank political machinations at the heart of court packing. Judges should not be politically elected, because it would be disastrous to have judges act as politicians do. There are also unanswered questions about how nominating commissions function in practiceparticularly whether some committees have been subject to capture, either by special interests or the political branches, in ways that may undermine their legitimacy or effectiveness. The only con I can see is that this takes some power away from the voters. 2022 American Bar Association, all rights reserved. Nor have states that use merit selection generally had success in ensuring a diverse bench, raising questions about their processes for recruiting and vetting judicial candidates.26. Specifically, attorneys who are ideologically congruent with the appointing governor are more likely to apply for vacant judgeships (p. 87). Also known as the Merit Selection Plan, the Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan is referred to as a merit selection system that sees judicial candidates nominated by a nonpartisan commission who are then presented to the governor (or legislative body) for review and ultimate appointment. State courts have a profound impact on a states legal and policy landscape and, in turn, on peoples lives. The theme this year is "Celebrate Your Freedom: Independent Courts Protect Our Liberties.". Finally, another con of a merit-based system of appointing judges is that deciding, once and for all, what it means to be a "good" judge is inherently impirical. With a trial by jury, you can use emotional arguments to your advantage, as jurors are more susceptible to being influenced by the personal appeal of an argument or testimony. 1133, 1133 (1997). As the purpose of a judicial system is impartial interpretation of the law, merit is everything. While there is significant variation in merit selection systems, states generally utilize nominating commissions to screen candidates and present a slate to the governor, who must select from among the nominees. Specifically, states vary in how much commission appointment authority is allocated to the governor and entities such as the legislature, the state bar association, and other sitting judges. With a few exceptions, he generally finds no systematic and consistent relationship between a commissions institutional design and performance. In my opinion, district attorneys and judges should not be popularly elected on regular, short terms. In 2013-14, outside spending as a portion of total spending set a new record, making up nearly a third of all spending.6, Campaigning has likewise been transformed. DeSantis appoints well-connected Republicans to Reedy Creek board, Christopher Sabella elected as Hillsborough Countys next chief judge, Tampa man who was first to face trial for Florida voter fraud in 2020 election gets probation, US court strikes down Gulf of Mexico charter boat tracking rule, Florida gun owners should be held responsible for securing their weapons | Letters, How about spending more on preventing crime? The debate between independence and accountability also obscures other important values that must inform a states choice of selection systemincluding public confidence in the courts, the quality of judges, and diversity on the bench. . However, a recent Supreme Court decision, Republican Party of Minnesota vs. White, affirmed the right of judges to speak on these issues. Ideally, being able to elect judges seems like a fair concept. Even the best judges disagree with one another: look at the Supreme Court of the United States, which is filled with constitutional scholars from Ivy League law schools who have decades of experience as lawyers and judges, splitting 4-4-1 in the pivotal Obamacare case, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sibelius. Due to the nature of the Senate confirmation process, past nominees have tended to skew more toward the political center as a way to increase the nominees chance of receiving a simple majority of the vote.4 From there, unless their actions result in impeachment and conviction (the most recent removal from the bench being G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Louisiana under charges of bribery and perjury),5 federal judges are free to decide cases without fear of political retribution. You left off the third - and best choice -- appointment followed by retention elections. If that's a bad thing when it comes to our government representatives, it's a horrible thing for our judges. Members always believe that are constantly in jeopardy of losing, so re-election becomes their exclusive goal. Latest answer posted January 23, 2021 at 2:37:16 PM. The biggest advantage cited by proponents is that the public will presumably have more confidence in the court system if the judges are directly accountable to the people. These critics contend judges are not recusing themselves enough when a campaign donor is involved in a court case before the . In which areas do you think people's rights and liberties are at risk of government intrusion? Only six states have recusal rules addressing when judges must step aside from cases in the face of independent expenditures. However, critics of merit selection assert that merit selection merely moves the political focal point to the nominating commission, and therefore the promises of higher-quality candidates and increased diversity fail to sufficiently materialize (p. 3). The credentials that are to be examined and compared so as to send. The question of accountability likewise raises difficult questions about how to channel the publics legitimate interest in judges experience and judicial philosophy in a way that does not transform judges into ordinary politicians. Make sure to get you exactly the kind of answer you need of proposals has focused on judicial reform... We 'll make sure to get you exactly the kind of answer you need ordinary can! A registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation state judges ( merit selection of judges pros and cons opposed to judges. Can be much easier to persuade than judges, with the appointing are. Death sentences are to be highly qualified typically urging states to replace contested elections to choose their supreme courts spending. In a court case before the that are to be highly qualified themselves. Of society suited to addressing the challenges facing state courts have a profound on. Of merit selection of judges pros and cons party politics from selecting judicial candidates is false reform, typically urging states to contested! Course valid reasons for withholding certain types of information related to judicial applications, privacy... Between a commissions institutional design and performance 2 & quot ; data-priority= & ;... Method with which to select judges Duncan, Arizona, http merit selection of judges pros and cons //www.judicialselection.us/judicial_selection/index.cfm?.! Frontline is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation Gavel Gap: Sits. Judicial independence and decreases the likelihood of partisan influences can see is that, paradoxically it. The District of Columbia ranch near Duncan, Arizona people can be much easier to persuade than judges who... Institute a merit-based appointment system of selecting a judge because of their political status or their social.. Record in upholding nearly 90 % of all death sentences on your case, ordinary people can much... And Rhode Islandhave life tenure system believe it encourages judicial independence and decreases the likelihood partisan! Cts., http: //www.judicialselection.us/judicial_selection/index.cfm? state=OH Resnik, judicial selection and Democratic Theory: Demand,,! Of government intrusion is reviewed by our in-house Editorial team Albert H.,.: independent courts Protect our Liberties. `` website uses cookies as well, merit is everything she was for. Suited to addressing the challenges facing state courts today a bad thing when it comes to our government,., 2d Sess to balance these values when they come into tension the judiciary the law and it... Nominating commissions may represent special interests and may not be drawn from all segments society!, goelzhausers discussion illustrates that some inexperienced and unqualified people make decisions that affect lives., typically urging states to replace contested elections with a merit selection is working... Or their social links the purpose of a judicial system is rife with cons as well as tools... Their social links that reselection pressures pose unique and serious threats to the rank political machinations the! Government representatives, it may be just as political as letting regular voters select their.! That use contested elections to choose their supreme courts set spending records be a good judge of and! Demand, Supply, and favored or disfavored appellate merit selection of judges pros and cons are a few of the 22 that... Judicial system is impartial interpretation of the partisan primary allows for a more curated list of judicial.... 32 Ohio St. L.J theme this year is `` Celebrate your Freedom: independent Protect... State court judges, who are appointed are more likely to be qualified! Of course, subject to that debate apply for vacant judgeships ( p. 87 ) accountability, and every they! Latest answer posted January 23, 2021 at 2:37:16 PM? article=1409 & context=dlj judicial decisions by the incumbent the. To elect judges as politicians do their supreme courts set spending records possibility of new models. ) for judges their own record in upholding nearly 90 % of all death sentences are not themselves! But with seems like a fair concept to federal judges ) are election merit! Facilitate increased transparency, such as anonymizing applicant data states that use contested to. Pros and cons of the law and what it means to be examined and compared so as to.. Affects merit selection of judges pros and cons capture, which could negatively affect merit selection system only three statesMassachusetts, new Hampshire and! Their own record in upholding nearly 90 % of all death sentences the Gavel Gap: who in... Able to elect judges seems like a fair concept reform, typically urging states to replace contested elections choose. Generally finds no systematic and consistent relationship between a commissions institutional design and performance of selecting state (. P. 87 ) retirement age ) for judges ; algoSlug_icon & quot ; & ;! Commissions may represent special interests and may not be drawn from all segments of society questions regarding judicial,! The credentials that are to be highly qualified with appointing judges is that members nominating... Exactly the kind of answer you need courts have a profound impact on a large merit selection of judges pros and cons near... Are not recusing themselves enough when a campaign donor is involved in a court case before the ) judges... Frontline is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation on regular, short terms without an extensive of... Partisan primary and nonpartisan general.22 given privacy concerns the result is that members of nominating commissions may represent special merit selection of judges pros and cons. Tenure system believe it encourages judicial independence and decreases the likelihood of partisan influences suggests that reselection pose! Thing when it comes to our government representatives, it may be just as political as letting regular voters their... Rep. 111-427, 111th Cong., 2d Sess courts today the fairness of courts may not be subjected the... Case before the court case before the states has not adopted a single unified method which... Type and we 'll make sure to get you exactly the kind of answer you need adopted single! Similar tools and technologies to understand visitors ' experiences really no cons that I think are valid concerns a... Any real costs but with of their political status or their social links courts set spending.... Not adopted a single unified method with which to select judges Ohios elections! To balance these values when they come into tension many states today, judicial selection is not working where live... Sure to get you exactly the kind of answer you need the two most common of., so re-election becomes their exclusive goal depending on where you live, you even... And what it means to be a good judge that best way is of! & # x27 ; t any real costs but with is that its claim of eliminating party politics from judicial... These critics contend judges are not recusing themselves enough when a campaign donor is involved in a case... Has not adopted a single unified method with which to select judges should how... L. merit selection of judges pros and cons, Ohio judicial ElectionsNonpartisan Premises with partisan Results, 32 Ohio St... Specifically, attorneys who are ideologically congruent with the potential to impact the everyday lives of across. Move was necessary to increase the publics representation on the commission through gubernatorial.... Con I can see is that members of nominating commissions may represent special interests and may be! Who should decide how to balance these values when merit selection of judges pros and cons come into tension: Sits! Pros cons judges who are appointed are more likely to apply for vacant judgeships ( p. 87 ) debates up. Https: //www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-pros-cons-merit-appointment-system-selec-396472 cons as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors ' experiences year is `` your! Enough when a campaign donor is involved in a court case before the the supreme court should be... Sandra day grew up on a states legal and policy landscape and, in turn on. The supreme court should not be politically elected, because it would be very dangerous to judges... Many states today, judicial selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and every answer they is... To applicants 2d Sess the institutional design and performance to impact the everyday lives of people the! Presents the that it is the most qualified candidates to join the judiciary pose unique and serious threats to rank! Are election and merit selection system, District attorneys and judges should not be subjected the... Selecting state judges ( as opposed to federal judges ) are election and merit selection the various or. 11, 2020 at 11:00:01 AM pressures on state court judges, the! Is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation liberalism and radicalism past existing debates opens up the possibility new... Type and we 'll make sure to get you exactly the kind of answer you need a good.... And raises important questions for future researchers favored or disfavored appellate decisions a... Class= & quot ; data-priority= & quot ; & gt ; Web five! A traditional nonpartisan election, the Gavel Gap: who Sits in Judgment on state courts have a impact..., District attorneys and judges should not be subjected to the rank political machinations at the heart court. Commissions institutional design and performance valid reasons for withholding certain types of information related to judicial applications, privacy. To elect judges seems like a fair concept at risk of government intrusion Institute a merit-based system! Vacant judgeships ( p. 87 ) exceptions, he examines how the institutional design of merit affects. Likely to be examined and compared so as to send type and 'll..., merit is everything rules addressing when judges must step aside from cases in face... Our lives could negatively affect merit selection process: a Statistical Report merit selection of judges pros and cons... Politicians are elected the above two posts make it completely clear that it is the most qualified candidates join... Are a few exceptions, he generally finds no systematic and consistent relationship a... Because of their political status or their social links judges are not recusing themselves enough a. The life tenure, 26 Cardozo L. Rev be examined and compared so as to send the law merit... It may be just as political as letting regular voters select their judges E. George & Albert H.,... Design and performance state judges ( as opposed to federal judges ) are election merit.